Comments on: Congestion Charging - Manchester http://adrenochrome.today.com/2008/12/27/congestion-charging-manchester/ Read the BBC, then come read me - Britain de-bunked! Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:42:23 +0000 http://www.today.com/version-2.3.1 By: adrenochrome http://adrenochrome.today.com/2008/12/27/congestion-charging-manchester/#comment-8 adrenochrome Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:06:42 +0000 http://adrenochrome.today.com/2008/12/27/congestion-charging-manchester/#comment-8 Hi hindleyite I should admit that I do not own a car and rely on public transport, so I am noy someone who simply is not willing to give up their car. I'm glad to hear from one of the 22.4% who voted yes, and would enjoy hearing your views on my alternative strategy. Thanks for reading, and all the best for the new year and beyond. Hi hindleyite

I should admit that I do not own a car and rely on public transport, so I am noy someone who simply is not willing to give up their car. I’m glad to hear from one of the 22.4% who voted yes, and would enjoy hearing your views on my alternative strategy.

Thanks for reading, and all the best for the new year and beyond.

]]> By: hindleyite http://adrenochrome.today.com/2008/12/27/congestion-charging-manchester/#comment-7 hindleyite Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:21:51 +0000 http://adrenochrome.today.com/2008/12/27/congestion-charging-manchester/#comment-7 Oh. I voted for the improvements because I could put up with cars being charged if it would dramatically improve local public transport. From what I remember, the info booklet that came with the voting form had about eight pages of "benefits of voting yes" and one page about the congestion charges - it seems everybody was just drawn to that. Oh. I voted for the improvements because I could put up with cars being charged if it would dramatically improve local public transport.

From what I remember, the info booklet that came with the voting form had about eight pages of “benefits of voting yes” and one page about the congestion charges - it seems everybody was just drawn to that.

]]>